Search for: "R. B." Results 7281 - 7300 of 55,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 7:44 am by Lindsay A. Heller
After the Orders were entered, the former husband had two New Jersey attorneys write to the former wife indicating his consent to the form of QDRO but seeking (a) valuation for a lump sum payment that was not applicable and (b) to offset the arrears that accrued because he had wrongfully collected her share of the benefits. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
L’inscription est ouverte à tous ; deux types d’inscription sont possibles : Les inscriptions à la formation complète couvrant les deux séries d’examens blancs et leurs corrections ; Les inscriptions partielles à certaines épreuves : Pré-examen, Epreuve A, Epreuve B, Epreuve C et/ou Epreuve D. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm by Joy Waltemath
The rat did not frighten or intimidate and was, in the end, “symbolic speech” protected by the First Amendment and permissible under NLRA Section 8(b)(4)(ii)(B). [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:56 pm
As set forth in part in the DOJ Release:[B]eginning by at least 2008 and continuing through 2014, precious metals traders employed by MLCI schemed to deceive other market participants by injecting materially fal... [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:56 pm
As set forth in part in the DOJ Release:[B]eginning in or about March 2016, Alhassan and his unindicted co-conspirators operated a romance scheme based, in part, in Ghana and in Charlotte. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:49 am by Ilya Somin
Here's what it says: The Attorney General shall have the authority to specify the applicability of the requirements of this subchapter to sex offenders convicted before the en­actment of this chapter . . . and to prescribe rules for the registration of any such sex offenders and for other categories of sex offenders who are unable to comply with subsection (b). [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 8:35 am by Astarita
”The SEC’s complaint charges the defendants with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and the market manipulation provision of Section 9(a)(1) of the Exchange Act.The SEC’s continuing investigation is being conducted by Jennifer K. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:24 am by Florian Mueller
I can't think of any negative effects on competition in those markets.Part B of Qualcomm's reply brief addresses the likelihood of success of its a [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:18 am
Earlier today, the General Court (GC) issued a keenly-awaited ruling (T‑307/17), in which it upheld the earlier decision of the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal (R 1515/2016-2), and found this three-stripe EU trade mark (EUTM) owned by adidas:invalid. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
GEICO has reversed many years of precedent and created a seismic shift in the law.At the request of the Pennsylvania Bar Institute (PBI), Attorneys Scott B. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intact, compagnie d’assurances, 2019 QCCA 1022 [[75] En l’espèce, la preuve ne permet cependant pas de conclure que l’intimée a intentionnellement privé l’appelant de sa libre disposition du bâtiment sinistré en refusant la réclamation ni qu’elle a intentionnellement porté atteinte à sa dignité ou à sa réputation en alléguant sa connaissance et sa participation… [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 3:25 am by Susan Ross (US)
The judge instructed the jury that DynaStudy had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence (1) that HISD without authorization from DynaStudy, either (A) intentionally removed or altered any copyright management information on DynaStudy’s copyrighted works or (B) distributed copies of DynaStudy’s copyrighted works knowing that the copyright management information has been removed or altered without DynaStudy’s permission, and (2) that when HISD took such action, it knew… [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 3:25 am by Susan Ross (US)
The judge instructed the jury that DynaStudy had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence (1) that HISD without authorization from DynaStudy, either (A) intentionally removed or altered any copyright management information on DynaStudy’s copyrighted works or (B) distributed copies of DynaStudy’s copyrighted works knowing that the copyright management information has been removed or altered without DynaStudy’s permission, and (2) that when HISD took such action, it knew… [read post]