Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
Working from offices in California and Washington, the GCC team uses a database program or `tool’ to collect the data. . . . [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
Pursuant to the express word of the United States Supreme Court itself. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
Google Android-Java copyright case (initial reaction to ruling, follow-up, and detailed refresher Q&A, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has just issued a formal mandate to the trial court, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, remanding the high-profile lawsuit for a determination on fair use and (if Oracle prevails) remedies. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 12:26 am
It told the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that it had "conferred with Appellee International Trade Commission and Intervenor Apple Inc., and neither party object[ed] to the requested voluntary dismissal. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:48 pm
I hope Vergara stands, as how California goes, so goes the rest of the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:15 pm
This was both unfortunate, and odd, since the United States Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit had previously held just the opposite.. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
A recently published decision, Mendoza v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
From the States and Municipalities: California – Calif. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:28 am
Blue Diamond Growers, the plaintiff brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to certify a nationwide class of consumers who purchased Blue Diamond almond milk products containing allegedly false and deceptive labels. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
A few weeks ago, I reported on six cases in which the Solicitor General has recently filed briefs expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm
Delafontaine also has a website on the role of historians as expert witnesses in United States tobacco cases. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am
The scheme overall seems well-focused on protecting murals and other works installed in buildings, like the Picasso, from destruction (the approach under California’s Art Preservation legislation was different; see California Civil Code, s. 987(h). [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
County of Monterey (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1095, 1116; California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
This past week, the United States District Court of Eastern District of New York denied Duck Walk’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
Peter Hirtle, Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center Advisory Board It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
Peter Hirtle, Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center Advisory Board It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
Peter Hirtle, Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center Advisory Board It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 1:58 pm
It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the practice in California Forestry Assn. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:12 am
United States and explains that, “[a]s a statutory interpretation case,” it “is especially notable in two ways: for using ordinary principles of statutory interpretation in a treaty implementation case and for the lack of interpretive deference afforded the Executive Branch. [read post]
