Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 7281 - 7300 of 10,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
Nike went after one end user for ordering Chinese counterfeit trainers via the Internet: EWPCC summary judgement in Nike v E Bateman (IP Dragon) Crosstown Music bitten by partial assignment of copyright: EWCA decision in Crosstown v Rive Droite & Ors (IP Whiteboard) Possibility of obtaining summary judgment in patent cases: Patents Court decision in Virgin Atlantic v Delta (Kluwer Patent Blog) Keeping down the price of copyright justice (1709 Blog) United… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:11 am by Dianne Saxe
According to section 5 of the Act, a person must register as a lobbyist if they are paid to either a) communicate with a public office holder regarding (i) the development of any legislative proposal by the Government of Canada or by a member of the Senate or the House of Commons, (ii) the introduction of any Bill or resolution in either House of Parliament or the passage, defeat or amendment of any Bill or resolution that is before either House of Parliament, (iii) the making or… [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Although the blog allowed comments to be posted, it was clearly stated that such comments were not checked before publication and that commentators were responsible for their own statements. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
Ct. 1057 (2007), State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
(c) all counterclaims, cross-claims and third party claims; (d) all common law claims, based on contract, tort, fraud, or intentional torts; (e) all claims based on a violation of any state or federal constitution, statute or regulation; . . . [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:55 am by Susan Brenner
[H]e stated that he had listed Revatio as one of her medications. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Desinor, 525 F.3d 193, 202 (2d Cir. 2008); and 3) the evidence adduced at trial that defendant killed the two victims while engaging in a drug offense punishable under 21 U.S.C. section 841(b)(1)(A) was sufficient for a jury to convict him under 21 U.S.C. section 848(e)(1)(A). [read post]
22 May 2023, 3:52 pm by Josh Blackman
§ 1391(e)(1)(B) because the United States, one or more of its agencies, and one or more of its officers in his or her official capacity are Defendants; and a substantial part of the events giving rise to Plaintiffs' claims occurred in this District. [read post]