Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 15,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975) and properly grant a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the state trial court failed to rule formally on a defendant’s request for self-representation? [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
Juror 2”, who said “during voir dire that she was a self-employed crime fiction writer”. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:00 am
The decision in NKT Cables A/S v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am
S. 606 et seq.; United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Gary Seger v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm
Given its integral function, it is self-evident that the absence of the bannister was a defect in the state of the property which was continuing because of the failure or omission of the party responsible for the repairs of the structure to replace it or to insist on its replacement by the tenant. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm
Given its integral function, it is self-evident that the absence of the bannister was a defect in the state of the property which was continuing because of the failure or omission of the party responsible for the repairs of the structure to replace it or to insist on its replacement by the tenant. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:03 pm
Cal.) in X Corp. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 7:24 am
I know of two constitutional cases relevant to this discussion: Michigan State Police v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:37 pm
In New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:38 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 3:25 pm
For example, see United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:23 am
United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
Because citizens can acquire “alternative” firearms for self-defense, the impact on self-defense was not “severe,” said the 2nd Circuit. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:33 am
The United States Supreme court in South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:33 am
The United States Supreme court in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:08 pm
From Levitt v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
Rather than following Chevron v. [read post]
