Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 7281 - 7300 of 21,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
Marco Sassòli, The Convergence of the International Humanitarian Law of Non-International and International Armed Conflicts – The Dark Side of a Good Idea Urs Saxer, Staaten als Grundeinheiten des internationalen Systems Edzard Schmidt-Jortzig, Politik und Ethik Paul Seger, Let the Sunshine In: Five Small States on a Mission to a More Transparent United Nations Security Council Bruno Simma, »Ja, aber«: Der International Gerichtshof und das… [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm by Rusty Shackleford
What the future holds for the Death Penalty in the United States is uncertain. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
With the benefit of 25 years of hindsight, a look at some of those amicus briefs reveals a good deal about the scientific and legal acumen of the “friends of the court. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Sundara Rajan, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Glasgow, depicts a fascinating drama in which the principal actors are two literary ladies and, making a relatively rare appearance centre stage, the United States Postal Service. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 5:18 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
On appeal, Justice Bennett, Justice Nicholas and Justice Yates have found that the relevant claims of the XR patent are invalid, and that the primary judge erred in finding that they were entitled to the benefit the priority date of United States Patent Application No 60/14006, filed on 25 March 1996. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:56 am by Ken
” Brief for United States 8; see also id., at 12. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm by Michael S. Knoll
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 4:50 pm
Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN NOT CONSIDERING THIS COURT'S DECISION IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 8:32 am
Last weekend, David Han had a short post at Prawfsblawg criticizing the use of “historical” tests in Free Speech jurisprudence: A few terms back, in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:14 am by SHG
United States, but the case is all about Amy. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:48 am by Mark Nieds
This changed on June 21, 2018 when the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]