Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 9,831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm
As Barnett explains: Spooner supplemented this interpretive claim about original public meaning with a principle of construction he took from the 1805 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am
It is time for the United States to stop debating whether to address it, and start talking about how to address it. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
As Akhil Amar has observed, "[v]irtually no serious modern scholar - left, right, and center - thinks that [Slaughterhouse] is a plausible reading of the Amendment. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
It’s a case called Minarsky v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
It’s a case called Minarsky v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
See, e.g., Vance v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:47 pm
However, if you buy something – like shoes or a tee shirt – directly from a retailer, the cost of your actual gift (unless otherwise stated) is zero. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
Todd Hawkins et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:02 pm
In FTC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
Khlevner v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 8:52 pm
In today’s case (Knauf v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:56 am
Devlin knew the guy wasn't buying bus tokens. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat) United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs) US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
Eventually, the AG states that an anti-suit injunction cannot be qualified as a ground of non-recognition for a violation of public policy under article V (2)(b) NYC (paras 160 ff). [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:50 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
The specification expressly states that “an effective dose … can be from … about 480 mg to about 720 mg per day. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 10:21 am
The federal judge didn't buy Youssef's argument:[T]he October, 2007, revocation of consent . . . does not require suppression of the internet history. [read post]
