Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 11,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 1:17 pm
In his recent decision in the case of Glazer v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:15 pm
(February 2011), Sylvester v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:15 am
(February 2011), Sylvester v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:26 am
In Herman v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 5:00 am
In Andrews v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:17 pm
Eady J referred to the principles outlined in Bergens Tidende v Norway (2001) 31 EHRR 16: “Where, as in the present case, measures taken by the national authorities are capable of discouraging the press from disseminating information on matters of legitimate public concern, careful scrutiny of the proportionality of the measures on the part of the court is called for.” Here, the production orders did create the risk of discouraging the press: a perception of cooperation… [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:09 am
(Al Rawi v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] QB 289 Sumption stays scrupulously clear of any evaluation of this particular legal and ethical “muscle” and whether it should prevail over other arguably robust legal and ethical arguments, such as the need to maintain the secrecy of material supplied to the UK under intelligence cooperation arrangements (the issue at the centre of many recent cases, notably Binyam Mohammed v… [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:08 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:25 pm
City of Lake Forest v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:30 am
Cybersecurity: "Cyber-Threat Cooperation Emerging Between U.S. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:53 pm
S. 545, 561 (1977); and Santobello v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:14 pm
The Court also rejected arguments regarding the production of documents, the ability of defendants to secure foreign documents by Letters Rogatory, or the production of documents under Brady v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:54 am
Part V explores the cheapest cost avoider test and concludes that online copyright infringement is a joint-care, unilateral accident, where copyright owners and ISPs should cooperate to reduce the monitoring cost. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
Legal Risks Under International Privacy Laws – bit.ly/JyhIRp (Sheldon, Mark & Anderson) Cyber-Threat Cooperation Emerging Between U.S. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:35 am
Federal courts, including the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in a decision it cited here, have articulated various other standards, [i.e.,] Cooper v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:50 pm
A cooperative shareholder, who owned shares in two cooperative apartments at the 111 Tenants Corp., had subleased both apartments since they were acquired in 1972. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:21 am
For infringements on religious practices of Native peoples, however, the Supreme Court held otherwise in Lyng v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:49 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
