Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 7301 - 7320 of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am by Nicolas Round (Bristows)
  If that turns out to the case then Illumina Cambridge Limited v Latvia MGI Tech SIA and others is a substantial judgment to mark this departure. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“‘When a plaintiff brings a cause of action based upon fraud, the circumstances constituting the wrong shall be stated in detail'” (Edelman v Berman, 195 AD3d 995, 997, quoting Sargiss v Magarelli, 12 NY3d 527, 530 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see CPLR 3016[b]). [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
The ImmigrationProf Blog is hosting an online symposium on United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:50 am by Adrian Vermeule
(I recommend that Joe Biden and Mark Zuckerberg skip Davos until 2020, or at least have their talks vetted by the legal team). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Press, Forthcoming)).Frederick Mark Gedicks, Brief of Amici Curiae Church-State Scholars in Support of the Government in Sebelius v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
”   A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
– 10:15 a.m.Presented by the Section on Constitutional Law and co-sponsored by the Sections on Women in Legal Education and Legal History,  this program marks the 50th anniversary of Griswold v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:10 am by Adam Wagner
The Court then stated “That is a pass to which we ought not to come again. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:36 am by George Basharis
Case date: 08 October 2020 Case number: No. 19-3010 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Special Protection of Trade Marks with a Reputation under European Union Law by Michal Bohaczewski€ 136 [read post]
The Federal Circuit also reiterated that the TTAB need not find that the German company owned U.S. trademark rights to bring a cancellation action (Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. [read post]
The Federal Circuit also reiterated that the TTAB need not find that the German company owned U.S. trademark rights to bring a cancellation action (Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:07 am by Ron Coleman
”  The court stated that “there is no dispute that four of the six factors weigh in Plaintiff’s favor,” but upon this remand the focus was on the remaining two, the degree of similarity of the marks and the evidence of actual association between the marks. [read post]