Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 7301 - 7320
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2015, 3:38 pm
Despite the Government’s objections that a. the applicants’ predecessor freely entered into a bargain which he knew would have been subject to a restricted rent regime; b. the rationale of the rent cap was to secure business stability and c. the rent would increase in any event to 1,505 EUR by 2013, the Court found a breach of A1P1. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 3:38 pm
Despite the Government’s objections that a. the applicants’ predecessor freely entered into a bargain which he knew would have been subject to a restricted rent regime; b. the rationale of the rent cap was to secure business stability and c. the rent would increase in any event to 1,505 EUR by 2013, the Court found a breach of A1P1. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 10:28 pm
” Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
Plaintiffs alleged that the defendant deceived them by (a) misstating the actual weight of usable product in each stick of its deodorant, (b) misstating the total net weight of each stick, and (c) not stating the amount of non-functional slack fill in each stick. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:36 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
The IPKat was pacing up and down this morning, impatiently awaiting the Advocate General's Opinion in Case C-32/08 Fundación Española para la Innovación de la ArtesanÃÂa (FEIA) v Cul de Sac Espacio Creativo, S.L. and Acierta Product & Position, S.A., a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil Número Uno,… [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 5:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:28 am
Clapper v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm
§ 230(c)(1), and here, because the information that forms the basis of Anderson’s lawsuit—i.e., TikTok’s recommendations via its FYP algorithm—is TikTok’s own expressive activity, § 230 does not bar Anderson’s claims. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
Last week Advocate General Mengozzi gave his Opinion in Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing - & Management- Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz [available so far in 17 EU official languages, but not English, notes Merpel] on the interpretation of Article 4(1)(b) of Directive 2008/95, following a request by the Bundespatentgericht (German Federal Patent Court) to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling.The underlying… [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:41 am
Point 3(b) tracks Section 230(c)(2)(b) closely. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:05 am
Nicon, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court's June 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:53 pm
From today's unanimous Arizona Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
Following the recent CJEU decisions in Case C-617/15(Hummel v Nike, reported in various places including here) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive, reported on this very blawg), the English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor [2018] EWHC 3432 (Ch) has just become available. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 5:11 am
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds K is for Strike Price L is for Late Filing & Late Payment Penalties M is for Marginal Tax Rate N is for NSF O is for Over-The-Counter Medications P is for Pease Limitations Q is for… [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Daubert v. [read post]
