Search for: "State v. Richard"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 8,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Press v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
They lost in the Supreme Court in a 5-to-4 decision in 1973 (Gilligan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
This was because the application form for the Community plant variety right stated that the Cripps Pink apple trees were first marketed within the European Union (in France) in 1994 and first marketed outside the European Union (in Australia) in 1988. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 2:20 pm
Manchin quietly voted against the repeal as well, likely making a similar judgment about repeal’s impact on his rural state. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:33 am
Gulati and others v MGN Ltd (2015): the unredacted judgement At the time of the trial’s conclusion, and for three years afterwards, only a redacted version of the judgment was available. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Articles cited herein without stated authors are those of the author of this article—Ken Chasse.) [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:46 am
By RICHARD A. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
Times story.Here's a story from Richard Fausset, Jenny Jarvie and Henry Weinstein of the L.A. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
The key move is to argue that the Democrats' loss and Richard Nixon's victory actually confirmed the Civil Rights Revolution, because George Wallace lost, and he wanted to undo that revolution. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
Pharmacy Bd. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 2:05 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
Amy Howe has this blog’s main report of the argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:31 pm
(quoting District Judge Richard L. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:24 am
I was discussing the Fourth Circuit case of Porter v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Published: Richard Murphy, Administrative Law and Practice – 3 Admin. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 2:25 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm
The State Bar of Texas recently appointed Prof. [read post]
