Search for: "J. A. C." Results 7321 - 7340 of 19,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 6:01 am by Reference Staff
 BlummWildlife Law, Regulation, and Falconry: An Analysis of Legal Principles by William J. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:15 pm by Jordan E. Bublick
He did not claim the real property as exempt in his schedule C. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am by Brian A. Comer
Toyota Motor Corporation; Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.; Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyoda Gosei North America Corporation, Defendants, C/A No.: 1:10-cv-02187-JMC.Date of Verdict: June 21, 2013Venue: United States District Court, District of South Carolina, Aiken DivisionJudge: The Honorable J. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:15 pm
Finally, we go over to India, where the SiNApSE blog reviews the latest outbreak of yoga-based IP litigation and J. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 5:32 am by David Fraser
As Cory J. stated: Punitive damages may be awarded in situations where the defendant’s misconduct is so malicious, oppressive and high-handed that it offends the court’s sense of decency. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
Eleonora Rosati explains the progression of EGEDA, C-470/14. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:26 am
Payment of the postjudgment interest provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of this subsection shall reduce the postjudgment interest owed on such judgment. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:59 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Devices that qualify as DMEPOS include: (a) prosthetic and orthotic devices as defined in 42 CFR 414.202, that do not require implantation or insertion by a medical professional; (b) parenteral and enteral nutrients, equipment, and supplies as defined in 42 CFR 411.351 and described in 42 CFR 414.102(b);(c) customized items, as described in 42 CFR 414.224; (d) therapeutic shoes as described in 42 CFR 414.228(c); or (e) supplies necessary for the effective use of DME, as described… [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm by David Kemp
The sentences increases to a seven-year minimum if the firearm is brandished, 924(c)(1)(A)(ii), and to a 10-year minimum if it is discharged, 924(c)(1)(A)(iii). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:48 am by Jack D
A l’inverse de ce qu’avait jugé le Conseil d’État, les juges de la rue de Montpensier ont écarté cet argument au motif que cette différence de traitement avait déjà été validée dans l’une de ses précédentes décisions… ce qui ne répond pas véritablement au fond du sujet. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm by Steve Kalar
”Of Note: Mobley was convicted of § 924(c)(1)(A), brandishing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence. [read post]