Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 7321 - 7340
of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)); Salinger v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
Tuesday’s opinion in Ralls v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 1:56 am
A few months later in Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
The reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK was equally applicable here. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:32 am
Co., 91 NY2d at 653; Soto v State Farm Ins. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:20 am
State, 95 N.J. 487, 494, cert. denied, 469 U.S. 832, 105 S. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
Although the 1961 Southern District of New York case Molinas v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:35 am
In American Farm Bureau v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
Court-watchers are focusing on Espinoza v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
In the latest episode of The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 3:55 am
After noting that Ted Olsen, who argued Bush v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Cocaine, Crack Distribution Conspirator's Sentence Reduced to 240-Month Mandatory Minimum Term United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
By Mark P. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Later that same day, as journalists and bystanders watched, the applicant, Kaloyan Handzhiyski, the then chairman of the local chapter of the party Democrats for a Strong Bulgaria (DSB), arrived, and placed a red Santa Claus cap on the head of the already painted statute and, at its feet, leave a red sack bearing a white band marked ‘Resignation’. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
Ohio v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Decepticon Hasbro, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:37 am
“I make no comment whatsoever” (the Panel states) “on whether or not Respondent’s use of the Domain Name and Complainant’s WALMART marks on its website might otherwise be in violation of relevant United States state or federal trademark laws. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
