Search for: "State v. W"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 15,641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
(United States v Desmond (1982) 670 Fed. 2nd 414, 420)How great to start off w/a nice hook, then cite Bryan Garner, and then finish strong with Judge Aldisert. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:21 am
State law claim. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
The code relevant code states: (from DC Code 16-803)(2) (A) If a period of at least 5 years has elapsed since the completion of the movant's sentence for a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction in the District of Columbia or for a conviction in any jurisdiction for an offense that involved conduct that would constitute a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction if committed in the District, the conviction shall not disqualify the movant from filing a motion to seal an arrest and related… [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 10:44 am
(A shame that they forget to add the button that preserves exculpatoryevidence).United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 12:10 pm
Strother v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 12:10 pm
Strother v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 11:49 am
Filed: February 3, 2015Opinion by: Paul W. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
”’ W. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:45 pm
Bd. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:51 am
The Ralph Nader Debacle of 2000, that ushered in George W. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Wilson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am
Senate Bill 142: Water Rights - Change ApplicationsSenator Jerry W. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm
(D.I. 535)Footnote 6 is relevant to Teva v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
So, provided that absolute and relative grounds serve different purposes -– the protection of (i) a general interest and of (ii) the individual trade mark holder -- the AG stated that the relevant public has only one overall impression of the mark -- but that, for absolute grounds of refusal of registration the focus is on possible connections between the mark or its components and the goods and services covered while, for relative grounds, the focus is on the process of… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has stated that “[t]he Charter does not confer a freestanding constitutional right to health care. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
