Search for: "P. T.2" Results 7341 - 7360 of 14,921
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2014, 8:43 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
De surcroît, elle permet que soit appliqué l’effet de la chose jugée en matière d’extraditiondevant l’existence d’une extradition qui avait été déniée auparavant [2]. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:55 pm by Jessica Smith
Although it has been suggested that Rule 803(6) doesn’t cover government records, 2 Brandis & Broun on North Carolina Evidence at 886, case law suggests otherwise. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
[2] La demanderesse, Pétrolia inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 2:44 am
 (5) For the purposes of paragraph 4(a), Commission recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises as published in the Official Journal of the European Union L 124, p. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
La position de l'intimée va à l'encontre de ces principes, puisqu'elle suppose que l'intimée se contente d'attendre l'opinion de la Chambre pour voir si elle doit réagir ou pas.L'intimée justifiant le dépôt tardif par le fait que la décision de première instance lui était favorable, la Chambre répond que les règles de procédure établissent clairement que toutes les parties ont la… [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:57 am by Matt Bouchard
p=4523— The Lien Zone (@thelienzone) February 11, 2014 My two cents? [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am by Laura Sandwell
R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, heard 9 – 10 December 2013. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 8:50 pm by Douglas
Os avanços tecnológicos surgem a cada dia, mas nem sempre a legislação segue o mesmo ritmo, e os tribunais têm de se manifestar a respeito de muitas demandas. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Some statements upon which he claimed to have relied were made after he purchased the Escape, and though he pled that he visited Ford’s website “[p]rior to purchasing his Escape,” he didn’t say exactly when, how many times, which portions he viewed, or whether his viewing was connected to the purchase. [read post]