Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 22,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2022, 2:43 pm
From Cawthorn v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Stewart v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:57 pm
Today, the Texas Supreme Court issued opinions in Severance v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm
" Br. of Amicus United States 19-20. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
Uber explained that GitHub may well have user logs that can be accessed easily, that Uber would work with GitHub to address any concerns about the burden that responding to the subpoena would place on GitHub, and that it would be in a better position to evaluate any burden or notification concerns once it sees how GitHub captures the relevant data. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 11:04 am
In Konig v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:17 am
Virginia, revisiting the Supreme Court's decision last term in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 7:39 am
”’ [Commonwealth v.] [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:23 pm
Jack Balkin in this post neatly cuts right to what I think is the interesting question at the heart of the Court's pending Establishment Clause case, Hein v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
• Whether to strike down the expansion of Medicaid under the Act; the argument against this is that it places undue burden on individual states to pay for the expansion of a health care program for the poor. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
The court found that the provisions “ha[d] the effect of placing an unduly oppressive burden on the buyer. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
Trustee v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
Serv. 3d 208 (D.N.J. 1997) (plaintiffs “have the burden of designing a workable plan for trial embracing all claims and defenses prior to class certification”); see also Chin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:04 pm
The last significant ruling on device privacy at the border in the Ninth Circuit, whose rulings apply to nine western states, was in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
Serv. 3d 208 (D.N.J. 1997) (plaintiffs “have the burden of designing a workable plan for trial embracing all claims and defenses prior to class certification”); see also Chin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:15 am
” The Federal Circuit further noted that “[w]hile it is a petitioner’s burden to show … that any proposed substitute claims are unpatentable … it is Sisvel’s burden … to show that the proposed amendment complies with the relevant regulatory and statutory requirements. [read post]
