Search for: "State v. F. T." Results 7341 - 7360 of 18,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2018, 7:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Godfrey v.Eames, 68 U.S. 317, 326 (1863); see also Sticker Indus.,405 F.2d at 93 (stating that “each application in a longchain grows out of the one immediately preceding it”). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
A at 5) Relevant to the dispute at bar is Rule 18 of the EC nomenclature, which states that, "[f]or oxidoreductases using NAD+ or NADP+, the coenzyme should always be named as the acceptor 7 . . . [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:45 am by Barry Barnett
Oxford Health Plans LLC, 675 F.3d 215 (3d Cir. 2012) (post here), and Jock v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:29 am
 Regarding the state-law computer claim, the court entered judgment for Coughlin because the statute unambiguously stated that there was no civil remedy available for alleged unlawful acts regarding a computer. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:14 am
He has also posted extensively on a recent Ninth Circuit decision that bears on these issues: United States v. [read post]