Search for: "Wells v. Place"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 31,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
In those situations, legal defenses must be considered as well. [read post]
Argument preview: Determining the statute of limitations for military rape — and possibly a lot more
16 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
Georgia and its 2008 decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am
As for the notion of ‘territory’, it was recalled that it may include geographical areas which, although under the jurisdiction or responsibility of a different State, have a separate and distinct status under international law (Court of Justice, Council v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Constitution, as well as other constitutional provisions, and will almost certainly lead to extensive litigation. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:08 pm
The defendant didn’t do quite so well in Arroyo v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:15 am
Gordon discussed the different franchising options and the pros and cons of each as well as the importance of “good faith” within franchise agreements.The future of franchising might look very much like the future of fashion. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 1:06 am
But what has otherwise happened is a disaster for the pro-reform movement:The actual proposal is lopsided in patentees' favor and designed to eliminate or at least minimize any potential impact.And now, due to utter political incompetence in some places, outdated internal rules in others, and obsolete conventions on the part of key local pro-reform forces, the ministry has received more than enough backing to either turn its first draft into the federal government's formal… [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 10:17 am
Bateman v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
This morning one woke up, hours aftre President Trump declared a national emergency, to news that the House of Representatives (with the encouragement of both President Trump and Speaker Pelosi) passed HR 6201, the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:50 pm
In Durda v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:52 am
" Thus, in Cohen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Unlike any of my prior writings, the book is intended for a popular audience: people intrigued by how the Supreme Court decides cases as well as people who care deeply about the climate issue. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
However, the CJEU disagreed with the GC's conclusion that the absence of such a statement would preclude any association between those shops and the goods of the mark applied for.First, the CJEU emphasised that the line of authority derived from Praktiker concerned only applications for registration as TMs and did not concern protection of trade marks registered at the time of the Praktiker judgment (EUIPO v Cactus, C-501/15 P). [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:32 am
"V. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:00 am
Bill SteinmanThe FCPA Blog In U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Apple v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:20 pm
See Chatman v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
The Act also codified the Supreme Court’s holding in Alexander v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
This reflects a key research interest within CIPIL of assessing whether various legally-based incentives for pharmaceutical innovation are working well enough. [read post]
