Search for: "Little v State"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 26,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2007, 5:52 pm
I thought CL&P blog readers might find interesting the recent opinion in a North Carolina state court class action, Moody v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
I can and should take judicial notice of the fact that the National Health Service is a large organisation but I have very little evidence as to how bodies within the NHS would react to Dr Mattu’s dismissal. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:16 am
” Reference was then made to the case law establishing the following: (a) “[V]ery frequently words and behaviour with which police officers will be wearily familiar will have little emotional impact on them save that of boredom” (per Glidewell LJ, DPP v Orum [1989] Cr App Rep 261). [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:42 pm
Hill v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:37 pm
Other states, like Texas, have seen little distinction between a government asking for real property and asking for personal property (like money). [read post]
30 May 2022, 5:14 pm
Last month in Public Discourse, Josh Craddock “called the question”: if Roe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:01 am
A little more than a year ago, in Collecting the Use Tax: An Ever-Present Issue, I revisited the issue, because a news report about Pennsylvania’s Governor Corbett attempt to deal with the problem of collecting use taxes from state residents who make purchases outside of the state. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:30 am
In Zounds Hearing Franchising, LLC et. al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Rich Ford: Tell us about Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 12:24 pm
As we have seen in certain high-profile cases (Tfue v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:14 am
After five years, Regeneron has finally captured its transgenic mouseThe AmeriKat has had very little time to digest this morning's Court of Appeal decision in Regeneron v Kymab & Novo Nordisk [2018] EWCA Civ 671 which reversed Mr Justice Carr's finding that Regeneron's patents were insufficient. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:55 am
Instead, as the Supreme Court stated in a footnote, Oxford Health did quite the opposite. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:50 am
United States (1997) and New York v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:46 am
” In Sykes v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:07 am
But yesterday, in Kurns v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:24 pm
Money but not by SCOTUS, see United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am
Little Princess Express Cab Corp. v American Tr. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Rampart Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
