Search for: "State v. House"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 28,800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 10:35 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Jeffrey House v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Considering such factors with respect to the Claimant’s relationship with the Authority, the Appellate Division held that the Board's finding that an employer-employee relationship existed between Claimant and the Housing Authority was supported by substantial evidence and declined to disturbed it.The Devore v DiNapoli Decision In Devore v DiNapoli the issue concerned the mirror image of an employer-employee relationship: service provided as an independent… [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 1:57 pm
In Kanu v Southwark LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 1085, the Court of Appeal considered whether the public sector equality duty added an additional obligation on housing officers when they came to consider whether an applicant had a priority need. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm
On A1 P1, though, Mr S ran into the problem that his tenancy agreement stated "100. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:31 am
V. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:31 am
V. [read post]
24 May 2022, 2:43 pm
From Cawthorn v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
Ratliff and Lewis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:39 pm
Even when the evidence adduced by the state in support of your commitment is somewhat lame. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:53 pm
R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin) Last in our series of updates is Boolen v Barking & Dagenham. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 2:05 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court said this in Doe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:24 am
Pete Yost of the Associated Press reports on yesterday’s testimony by FBI Director Robert Mueller before a House subcommittee on the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:38 am
In Walker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:03 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s decision in Everson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:57 am
As noted in Bill's post, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
The judges reluctantly followed the line taken in R (Corner House Research and another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
Birmingham’s stated policy was considered by the court to be in excess of statutory requirements. [read post]
