Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 7361 - 7380 of 11,375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2012, 10:59 am
"  Whether the blank is filled in by an out-of-state case, a law review article, or a case that's now up in the California Supreme Court.Similarly, I can understand why a trial court might refer to those arguments as shorthand by referring to the now-unpublished case. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:00 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
" This may be a good sign for employers who wondered how trial courts would interpret the Brinker concurrence, which seemed to suggest a lower bar for class certification in meal period cases than was provided by the actual unanimous decision. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Because of his careful alignment with both plaintiffs’ and defense bars, Dr. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Court Rules That State Bar’s Professional Liability Fund Is NOT Subject to MMSEA Reporting Mark Popolizio, of the Crowe Paradis Services Corp. explains the case of Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:54 am by Sean Wajert
Readers of MassTortDefense recognize that one of the most challenging jurisdictions for potential class actions defendants is California, given the substantive law, some state courts' take on certification issues, and the aggressive plaintiffs' bar. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Stating that the standard was whether the goods were virtually identical to the genuine goods (not the marks), the court found this was a question of fact. [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Spring 2012 issue of Competition, journal of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the State Bar of California, is just out. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:57 pm
The California Supreme Court stated that the only way that the Defendant can prove that his right to counsel was violated is by showing that the violation influenced the outcome of the case, and remanded accordingly. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:31 am by lawmrh
Unlike Arizona where providers and programs are not approved or accredited by the state bar, other jurisdictions may require you to request approval of CLE Activity via a CLE Form. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:03 am by Jon Hyman
— from California Employment Law Report Does Résumé “Lying” Really Matter if You Can Perform? [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
  The plaintiff originally filed this suit in a state court but the defendant removed it to the federal district court under CAFA. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
  The plaintiff originally filed this suit in a state court but the defendant removed it to the federal district court under CAFA. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
”   That is the state of California’s voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage in that state. [read post]
10 May 2012, 10:56 am by russell
Female client was leaving a bar when cop began to harass her. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:32 pm by Louis M. Solomon
”) Finally, the Court was unwilling to read the contract’s choice of law provision, designating California, as clear evidence that California’s arbitration rules should apply as well. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:59 am
Supreme Court amicus brief on behalf of UNHCR in Negusie v Mukasey, an asylum case on which IntLawGrrl Jaya Ramji-Nogales has posted. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:00 pm
In California, where judges are required by law to report prosecutorial misconduct to the State Bar when it results in reversal of a conviction, a study by the Veritas Initiative shows that over a 10-year period involving 159 reversals, not one case was referred by judges to the State Bar. [read post]