Search for: "U.S. Direct Express" Results 7361 - 7380 of 9,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 7:56 pm by Alex Gasser
  In particular, Apple requests that the Commission immediately modify the LEO to make express that all of HTC’s Android-based smartphones and tablets are excluded from entry for consumption into the U.S., entry for consumption from a foreign trade zone, or withdrawal from a warehouse for consumption pending resolution of the enforcement proceeding. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:56 pm by Michael Geist
Producing original Canadian content is simply more expensive than licensing foreign (largely U.S.) content. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
MichiganDocket: 11-1327Issue(s): Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars retrial after the trial judge erroneously holds a particular fact to be an element of the offense and then grants a midtrial directed verdict of acquittal because the prosecution failed to prove that fact.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Mich.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionReply of petitioner Lebron v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm by WIMS
But the company also serves on the boards of two trade groups that regularly attempt to undermine public understanding of climate science: the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The Federal Circuit did acknowledge that “purely  extraterritorial conduct cannot constitute direct infringement” under Section 271(a) of the Patent Act in Title 35; that statute includes express language limiting its scope to domestic acts: “[W]hoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States, or imports into the United States any patented invention during the term of the patent therefore,… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
FDA set the task of assessing the safety of formaldehyde and methylene glycol ingredients to the CIR Expert Panel, under the aegis of the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
FDA set the task of assessing the safety of formaldehyde and methylene glycol ingredients to the CIR Expert Panel, under the aegis of the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
   This did not violate the First Amendment, the opinion said, because those supporters were still free to express their political views, they just could not do so as a form of expressed support for — and under the direction of — such a terrorist organization. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:04 pm by Emily Chan
  While many of the newer supporters of Invisible Children probably associate the organization most strongly with the domestic awareness and advocacy efforts in the U.S. related to Joseph Kony and Kony 2012, it became apparent that many supporters also strongly associate Invisible Children with direct services overseas. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:31 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
 Second, the presentations' focus on the unconventional ideologies of these modern groups tends to suggest a direct connection between belief and violence, which will again lead to inappropriate investigations based on First Amendment-protected activities rather than evidence of criminal conduct. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:24 pm by WIMS
"       CRS indicates that it surveyed the available literature, including the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
Kimberlin is scary-evil, and a threat to free expression. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:12 pm
But many analysts express concerns over the move, saying it can hurt the basic principle of equality under the law. [read post]