Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am
The trial judge held that he was bound to follow the approach adopted by the House of Lords in the cases of Cookson v Knowles [1979] AC 556 and Graham v Dodds [1983] 1 WLR 808 and to calculate the multiplier from the date of death. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:20 pm
Jaeger v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:36 am
These directions derived from Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168 and Regina v Powell and English [1999] 1 AC 1 and the Supreme Court and Privy Council had to decide whether the common law had taken a wrong turning in these cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm
I also have a case where a client has been the victim of what is likely to be a state sponsored online reputational attack. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:54 pm
Recent Supreme Court cases, including United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 2:53 pm
Ace Patents Corp., 315 U.S. 126, 136-37 (1942); Smith v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:30 pm
As the United States Supreme Court wrote in Chessman v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:31 am
"The demise of the MPPC happened in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 11:47 am
ACE J. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:43 pm
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
’ United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:20 am
Spokeo, Inc., and United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:53 am
The Supreme Court will resolve that question in Heffernan v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:41 am
The joint session of the Supreme Court and Privy Council heard the appeals in R v Jogee and Ruddock v The Queen (Jamaica) between the 27 and 29 October 2015. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Thus, timely pre-revocation notice was required under the amended statutory scheme (Mantena v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am
State regulations often are more strict. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
Other states may choose to take a different approach. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am
Personal injury was argued not to be a proper guide for awarding damages in libel relying on the judgment of Lord Hoffman in the Privy Council in The Gleaner Co Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
First, Dr Rolph identifies problems in the Lange (Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520) defence, noting it was not followed in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Pty Ltd [2001] 2 AC 227, a decision which the Australian courts have in turn refused to recognise, and which the High Court of Australia has declined opportunities to consider ever since, despite hinting at it in 2002: Skalkos v Assaf [2002] HCA Trans 649 (13 December 2002). [read post]
