Search for: "B. v. S."
Results 721 - 740
of 57,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2021, 5:15 am
The appellants A and B are brothers and Lithuanian nationals. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 4:24 am
Papa John's Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 11:23 am
Stern v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:18 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's use of a "plausibility" standard to order the dismissal of a plaintiff's civil rights action in Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:03 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:09 pm
The opinion addressed an issue that I've written about on this blog many times over the years: Does Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) preclude the admission of juror testimony/affidavit(s)... [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:51 pm
The Conglomerate is hosting an interesting blog symposium about Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court has today handed down its decision in Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, upholding the Employment Tribunal decision that the drivers are ‘workers’ within the meaning of S.230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) and the equivalent definitions in the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 (NMWA 1998) and the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR 1998). [read post]
Lesson From The Tax Court: Who Is An IRS Employee's Immediate Supervisor For §6751 Penalty Approval?
29 Nov 2021, 12:45 am
Today’s lesson involves yet more litigation over IRS compliance with the penalty approval process required by the formerly toothless §6751(b)(1). [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:06 am
§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(iii).HELD: District court did not err by relying on testimony of witness who violated witness sequestration in denying defendant's suppression motion.Read the opinion here. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:48 am
CGL – ADDITIONAL INSURED – ARISING OUT OF THAT PART OF LEASED PREMISES – PRIORITY OF COVERAGE L&B Estates, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
California’s Fourth Appellate District recently concluded that the Pineda v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:40 am
Minnesota Rule of Evidence 404(b) restricts the admission of evidence concerning a party's prior bad acts. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:08 am
The questions presented in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:28 am
To discuss the case, we have David B. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:17 am
Specifically, "While the majority's treatment of the Rule 404(b) issue is a welcome improvement on our circuit's law, I respectfully dissent from the finding that the serious Rule 404(b) error was harmless. [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:00 pm
“After Idaho lawmaker’s comments on Plan B, some worry other birth control is at risk”: Nicole Blanchard has this front page article in today’s edition of The Idaho Statesman. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
No doubt the Plaintiff's attorneys in Tucker v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:44 am
Torts — Liability of county — Scope of employment Amelia Mercer, Appellee, filed a complaint against Watts & Sims, Inc. d/b/a Trade Winds Night Club (“Trade Winds”) and Prince George’s County, Maryland, (the “County”) alleging that she was battered by an unknown off-duty Prince George’s County police officer. [read post]
