Search for: "BANKS v. BROWN" Results 721 - 740 of 999
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
For example, Judge Facciola in Disability Rights Council of Greater Wash. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
National Australian Bank, Ltd. governs whether a proposed application of the Alien Tort Statute would be impermis [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:23 pm by admin
Techs, Inc., ARB No. 08-032, ALJ No. 2005-SOX-015 (ARB March 31, 2011) (clarifying that the whistleblower protection provisions of SOX extend to employees of subsidiaries of publicly-traded companies even if those subsidiaries are privately owned); and Brown v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
National Australia Bank sharply cut back on the ability to bring suits to remedy overseas securities fraud that harms U.S. consumers. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
In this context, the idea of SMART – acronym for Scientific, Mathematical, Algorithmic, Risk, and Technology driven – Law becomes a perspective for analysis of new regulatory techniques already applied for taxation, fin tech, and banking, among other fields.Importantly, critical analysis of select algorithms reveals that they may also be opaque, discriminatory, fraudulent, and unfair. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
This practice of "red-lining" led to segregated neighborhoods which, even post-Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In a proceeding brought by the Royal Bank of Canada against a debtor, the bank required the mortgage discharge statement held by Scotiabank in order to complete a sheriff’s sale of the property. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 2:40 am by Sherica Celine
Bergin and Paul Lim of Arnold & Porter that highlights the Bank Service Company Act’s ongoing relevance and prominence in the regulation and examination of bank service companies. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Brown, No. 05-5462 Judgment resentencing defendant to 84 months' imprisonment in light of his prior state-law conviction of third-degree burglary, considered as a crime of violence, and his possession of firearms whose serial numbers had been obliterated, is affirmed over claims that the district court erred in: 1) increasing defendant's offense level; and 2) his sentence is unreasonable. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 7:58 am by charonqc
  I’ve never been a fan of Gordon Brown. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Barry Winograd
Co-op Banking Group, the Ninth Circuit left issuance of a stay to judicial discretion. [read post]