Search for: "C&C HOLDINGS LLC" Results 721 - 740 of 3,537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd… [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Code § 7704 (a)(1)(A), (B), and (C)) that confirm that the statute is not intended to prohibit mere concealment. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd… [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd… [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 1:23 pm by Gene Takagi
Transition teams – winning candidate and losing candidate may both have such teams, and there is a lack of rule about their conduct and compositionThey don’t appear to be government agenciesSome may be exempt under 501(c)(4), some may be exempt under 527; it may be possible to structure one as a 501(c)(3) on the basis of lessening the burdens of government, but there would be many hurdlesThey may be easier for charities to support after the person has been elected and… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 26 and Wednesday 27 January, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Balhousie Holdings Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (Scotland). [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 2:11 am by Peter Mahler
First, it dismissed Farro’s claim that the merger effectuated by written consent of the majority members in lieu of a meeting on 20-days notice to all members, was invalid under LLC Law § 1002 (c). [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
This includes courts in California, Delaware, Illinois, New York, and Washington.[26] To determine which category a letter of intent falls under, courts examine the intentions of the parties.[27] In fact, the primary factor of all letter of intent analysis is the intentions of the parties.[28] Intent is the “touchstone” upon which letter of intent litigation hinges.[29] C. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]