Search for: "C Husbands"
Results 721 - 740
of 3,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2023, 9:10 am
c=2&pdf=40355 [5] Id. [6] Bookholt v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:49 am
Jessica C. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:30 am
§ 1453(c). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:43 am
X, § 4(c), Fla. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:54 pm
JOHN C. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
Guest contributor Christopher C. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:44 am
My Husband Is Set Up As A "Section C" For His Taxes. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:16 am
It found that the intent of § 1408(c)(4)(C) was to allow a military member to specifically challenge personal jurisdiction over military pensions. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:52 pm
Husband was not able to meet the requirements of the statute. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
C. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 11:14 am
The house just sold, under the divorce decree, and I was arguing that increased the ex-husband's income by $100,000, the amount of his capital gains. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:59 am
District Judge George C. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:54 pm
The risk of tax reporting abuse is high where the IRS is relying upon schedule C's. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm
Family Code section 2040(b)(c). [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:45 am
C. 1.9(a), as amended, 490 Mass. 1305 (2022), existed. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
EVANS, Appellee. 5th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Qualified domestic relations order -- 401(k) -- Valuation -- In calculating one-half share of husband's 401(k) plan to be awarded to wife under terms of mediated settlement, trial court erred in including value of outstanding loans taken out by former husband to support parties' lifestyle -- Including outstanding loan balances in amount to be distributed to former wife would result in inequitable… [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:01 am
Exhibit B further stated that the parties “acknowledge that husband anticipates that the above payment is deductible to him and includable to wife”.Exhibit J was titled “CUSTODY, SUPPORT, VISITATION”. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
John C. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:30 am
He used a different name when he applied for a visitor’s visa and this incident made him inadmissible under Section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the INA. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:27 am
Brannan, 898 F.2d 107, 108 (9th Cir. 1990) (wife who had moved out of a house she co-owned with her husband could consent to a search after her husband changed the locks), with United States v. [read post]
