Search for: "CLARENCE LITTLE"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2006, 8:32 pm
Wainwright the court invalidated Clarence Gideon's conviction because he wasn't represented. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:48 pm
It makes murder look a little less murderous. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:25 am
You could argue a little bit more, a little bit less, but there aren't thousands of them. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Unlike Thomas, Jackson said little about the purported benefits of diversity in the collegiate environment. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
"And, it should be obvious that nine truly sincere originalist justices could easily depart from what they take to be the implications of the Second Amendment's original meaning by pointing to the changed facts that weapons today bear little or no resemblance to those of 1791 or 1868, and cities today are much more crowded than back then, so even if a gun law would have been deemed unconstitutional in prior eras, the exact same law should be upheld today because of changed… [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
There is surprisingly little supervision, even from your chief judge, and you enjoy life tenure anyway. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:14 am
I took a little risk. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am
And because it is not true, the sentiment does little to curtail the epidemic of suicide or other problems in the legal industry. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In a recent case, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:56 pm
” If probable cause erased a First Amendment violation, “little would be left of our First Amendment liberties, and little would separate us from the tyrannies of the past or the malignant fiefdoms of our own age. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 12:34 pm
Both sides calculated there was little to be gained from compromise or restraint. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
I think that he thought little of Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
The majority (opinion by Justice Breyer for himself and Chief Justice John Roberts, along with Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor) took route 1; the dissent (Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito), route 2. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 3:02 pm
Indeed, Gorsuch posited, it might be “a little anachronistic” to contend that states have a special interest in applying their family laws to Native Americans when, for many decades, “they didn’t do anything at all. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:08 am
Justice Elena Kagan delivered the opinion of the court, and Gorsuch wrote an opinion concurring-in-part and concurring-in-the-judgment, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am
New York is likely to have remarkably little precedential effect. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
The Rahimi opinion does little to clarify how courts should address other Second Amendment restrictions. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
States are now caught in the inevitable trap of (1) maintaining majority-minority districts under complex, overlapping legal precedents and (2) administering electoral schemes that do little to advance racial equality while doing much to undermine voter equality. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm
Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:17 pm
But under Dobbs, there is little, if any such right, remaining, and therefore Congress could not legislate to protect it using its Section 5 power to enact "appropriate" legislation to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
