Search for: "California State Board of Equalization"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
Administratively, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) will continue on their path of reversing all Obama-era regulatory initiatives. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:47 pm
They represent the interests of victims in communities across the United States, from Florida to Alaska, and from California to Maine which rely on a clean environment for their livelihood and recreation. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
Board of Supervisors, 584 N.W.2d 309 (Iowa 1998). [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:20 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am
Facts of Franchise Tax Board of California v Hyatt Gilbert Hyatt sued petitioner Franchise Tax Board of California (Board) in Nevada state court for alleged torts committed during a tax audit. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:23 am
The preamble to the Fall 2018 agenda stated that the future activity being considered by the Bureau included “reexamining the requirements of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) in light of recent Supreme Court case law and the Congressional disapproval of a prior Bureau bulletin concerning indirect auto lender compliance with ECOA and its implementing regulations. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:06 am
American companies and institutions spent three quarters of that money, making the United States a leader in AI. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
For example, with regard to corporate board quotas, there could be Commerce Clause as well as equal protection problems. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:44 am
Lawyered podcast, Imani Gandi and Jessica Mason Pieklo argue that “the fallout from the Court’s decision to overturn decades of precedent” in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:21 pm
Congressional, and State Board of Equalization districts to reflect new population and shifting population data. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:21 pm
Congressional, and State Board of Equalization districts to reflect new population and shifting population data. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:46 am
A community property state, California views all assets acquired during a marriage as equally belonging to both spouses. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:46 am
A community property state, California views all assets acquired during a marriage as equally belonging to both spouses. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am
Where the dispute is solely one of contract interpretation and there is no evidence of animus, bad faith, or intent to undermine the union, the Board does not seek to determine which of two equally plausible contract interpretations is correct. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Board and white flight to affirmative action and the Equal Rights Amendment.When we reached a natural pause in the material, I shifted direction. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
A trio of California laws meant to protect immigrants from the feds go into effect, says the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The ICWA and the federal regulations explicitly state that Awhere applicable State or other Federal law provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent or Indian custodian than the protection accorded under the Act, ICWA requires the State or Federal court to apply the higher State or Federal standard@ (25 CFR 23.106; see 25 USC ' 1921). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
If Red state voters and elected officials believe (as do I) that all votes should count equally nationwide and also that presidential elections should not focus only on a handful of swing states and ignore states like Texas and California that are solidly in the R or D column from the outset, they could simply agree to adopt NPV now, but declare that their adoption in their state won’t take effect until the election of 2032. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:19 pm
Similarly, in the Appeals of Amman & Schmid Finanz AG, et al.,10 the State Board of Equalization concluded limited partners were not doing business in California simply because of their interest as limited partners in a partnership that was doing business in California. [read post]
