Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 721 - 740
of 48,936
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 11:15 am
Costs to the claimant. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:12 am
A recent US Supreme Court decision, Sheetz v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:04 am
In this case, the Court found that Meril caused Edwards Lifesciences unnecessary costs and that it would be equitable to order Meril to pay all the costs, irrespective of the prospects of success of the application for provisional measures. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:33 am
By imposing a litigation risk on top of the construction cost of the sea wall, it makes adaptation just that much more difficult and expensive. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:49 am
” “During the investigation into one of those seven cases, Fields v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
The list here is impressive and includes: People v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONB. v Structure Tone, Inc. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The defendant accepted liability, publicly retracted the false allegations, apologised unreservedly for the damage and upset he caused and paid the claimant a substantial sum in respect of compensation and her legal costs. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:32 am
Upon seeing that lawsuit, the PE firm—perhaps already spooked by LMEG’s declining performance during the second half of 2016—predictably terminated its negotiations with LMEG, costing the Company and its owners millions. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:29 pm
OAK would then need to revert to their previous name and restructure their entire advertising campaign, which has already cost an estimated $150,000. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
[This post got stuck in my drafts folder…sharing it now for completeness] I see many cases against government employees for posting and moderating content on social media. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:33 pm
See Louisiana Wetlands, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 11:22 am
Kaercher v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am
The 7.3 is a V8, which means it has eight cylinders in a V formation — the most common layout for eight-cylinder engines. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am
The last four months in the DSA news feel like two years. [read post]
