Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 16,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2024, 1:30 am
On 12 July 2024 the English Court of Appeal gave its second FRAND determination judgment, in the context of an appeal and cross-appeal of Mellor J’s first instance decision in IDC v Lenovo. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 12:05 pm
The Plaintiff is Injured Crossing from the Overflow Parking Lot to the Church The plaintiff in the case of Vasilenko v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:50 am
The statement was made out of court so the “declarant” (person who made the statement) is unable to be cross-examined.The tricky part: hearsay may be admitted if the statement is not offered prove the truth of what was actually stated. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The statement was made out of court so the “declarant” (person who made the statement) is unable to be cross-examined.The tricky part: hearsay may be admitted if the statement is not offered prove the truth of what was actually stated. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 10:27 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 7:30 am
Holy Cross Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am
David Meyer-Lindenberg and I crossed Kathryn Kase, past-Executive Director of Texas Defender Services, now back to the trenches fighting Texas’ love of execution. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 9:43 am
EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU V. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:01 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
§ 3742 confer authority to correct a legal error absent a cross-appeal, particularly for "sentencing errors that the Government refrained from pursuing," and noted that the strict time limits on notices of appeal and cross-appeal would be undermined if an appeals court could modify the judgment in favor of a party who had filed no notice of appeal. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
Boumediene v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:33 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:04 am
Each of these defendants filed a motion to cross-examine the State's experts listing eight areas of concern about the internal workings of the Intoxilyzer 5000. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 2:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:04 pm
It is also asked to reverse American National Red Cross v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:09 am
The Second Circuit as a matter of first impression, considered whether the bar on extraterritorial application of the United States securities laws, as set forth in Morrison v. [read post]
