Search for: "DOES 1 - 20" Results 721 - 740 of 28,825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2012, 5:47 am
Iowa January 20, 2012)*: Here, Hubbard is not Defendant's spouse nor does she have legal title in Defendant's residence. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:12 am by Steven Gursten
It does beg the question: does Governor Snyder hate motorcycle owners? [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm by emagraken
Ippolito, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 146. [42]         The Court will reduce the non-pecuniary award it would otherwise have ordered by 20%. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 3:24 pm by Jason Brown
However, the nonmilitary spouse will likely lose the card upon divorce, except if the spouse served for at least 20 years and if the couple was also married for at least 20 years. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:42 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  Extension of the franchise to women and 18-20 year olds would require further amendments; denying the vote to noncitizens, juveniles under 18, and felons remains valid to this day.Section 1 of the same amendment requires equal protection of the laws. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:25 am by Gretchen Harders
  Although the Department stated that the providers must “talk” to each other, for the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2014, the annual limitation on out-of-pocket maximums will be considered satisfied if: (1) the major medical coverage satisfies the annual maximums; and (2) if the plan has coverage that applies a separate limit for other coverage (such as prescription drug coverage), a separate out-of-pocket maximum may be imposed as long as… [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:27 pm by Jon Katz
Commonwealth of Virginia, Record No. 0500-19-1 (Aug. 20, 2019). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:51 pm by Jeralyn
All three counts pertained to a "Jane Doe #1", an Italian model who testified Mr. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 3:09 pm
That's because, although FRAP 32.1 officially takes effect on Dec. 1, the rule will only apply to unpublished and non-precedential opinions issued on or after Jan. 1, 2007. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 4:42 am by jonathanturley
The court held: “Ordinary, law-abiding, adult citizens that are 18 to 20-year-olds are members of the people because: (1) they are members of the political community under Heller’s “political community” definition; (2) the people has a fixed definition, though not fixed contents; (3) they are adults; and (4) the Second Amendment does not have a freestanding, extratextual dangerousness catchall. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
How does Cohan’s amateur tax calculations of “something like a $20 million payment” get him to $20 million exactly? [read post]
6 May 2018, 5:23 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“As with past FBI active shooter-related publications, this report does not encompass all gun-related situations. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:48 am
Brumfield responds, however, also quite reasonably, that the decision in Hudson does not control this Court's interpretation of our own state statute, namely, 22 O.S.2001, § 1228. [read post]