Search for: "Ex parte Cross"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
Criminal law -- First degree murder -- Evidence -- Hearsay -- Trial court erred when it admitted into evidence an audio recording of statement made to police by person who implicated defendant in crime -- Admission of testimony violated right to confrontation of witnesses where statement was testimonial in nature and witness was not available or subject to prior cross-examination -- Trial court was within its discretion in finding that witness's refusal to testify rendered him an… [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 11:01 am
No person who was not a descendant (for instance, an ex-spouse) would be allowed to own voting units. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 11:01 am
No person who was not a descendant (for instance, an ex-spouse) would be allowed to own voting units. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 11:01 am
No person who was not a descendant (for instance, an ex-spouse) would be allowed to own voting units. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 11:01 am
No person who was not a descendant (for instance, an ex-spouse) would be allowed to own voting units. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:03 am
What would you do with an American mother, a Christian, who heard about this practice and adopted it as part of a custody battle with her ex-husband, a Muslim? [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:40 am
Ghomeshi assaulted them presented a field day for any lawyer with a rudimentary ability to cross-examine. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:24 am
And while ex parte procedures are necessary, they are a necessary evil. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:37 pm
The decision of the Board in ex parte reexamination 90/010,940of Cree’s U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 1:08 pm
Cross-examination without the benefit of the information plaintiffs’ lawyers are able to get through the informal and ex parte process. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Opening Remarks: Henry Smith—exploring the connections between private law and IP. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 8:31 am
Last month, the court affirmed a $600,000 judgment, plus attorneys’ fees and costs, against an ex-employee who assisted his son’s start-up company compete with his father’s former employer. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
A minimum of 40% of these involved cross racial identification. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:45 pm
California buyers could simply cross into the next state. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm
Two other observations: Eric has blogged a bunch about cases that tackle the issue of whether something is copyrightable (ex: 1, 2, 3, 4), and this is another one to add to that list. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:40 am
This hearing lasted ten hours, and both plaintiff and Roe had the opportunity to testify subject to cross-examination, to call witnesses, and to submit evidence. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
When Vermont sought to require the Plan’s third-party administrator, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:33 pm
" (Ex parte Breitenbach, PTAB 2015.)Details:Ex parte BreitenbachAppeal No. 2013-005344; Appl. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:33 pm
" (Ex parte Breitenbach, PTAB 2015.)Details:Ex parte BreitenbachAppeal No. 2013-005344; Appl. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:24 pm
The setup involves two ex parte reexaminations initiated by Alps. [read post]
