Search for: "Farmer v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 1,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 5:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
The pure federal common law cause of action expounded by the Supreme Court in 1985’s National Farmers Union v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 11:50 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Recent developments have upended many of our earlier predictions of the likely post-election immigration landscape in the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by Catriona Murdoch
The report rightly stated that the use of control orders was under review. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:18 pm by Todd Janzen
 The changes were necessitated by the the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling earlier this year, National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Aaron
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
 In June 2010, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a District Court abused its discretion in issuing an injunction in a case involving GM alfalfa, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Betty Lupinacci
This new tax was challenged in court and the Supreme Court, in Pollock v. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 3:00 am by Lee Davis
The Tennessee Supreme Court ruled in a recent opinion, State of Tennessee v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Wayfair: Court approves state sales tax collection from out-of-state vendors [Caron/TaxProf first and second link roundup, Trevor Burrus and Matthew Larosiere, earlier] Ohio v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
A couple of weeks earlier, however, the Supreme Court of the United States, known as SCOTUS, threw a wrench into Regan’s plans by agreeing to hear the case known as Sackett v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am by Gretchen Harders
On March 26, 27 and 28, 2012, the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) heard oral arguments in a series of cases, including Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. [read post]