Search for: "Flash v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 1,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
-Conn (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): All threats, no action…: Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL (IPKat)   United States  US General California’s Trade Secret disclosure statute doesn’t apply in Federal Court – or maybe it does (IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO wants to change restriction practice (Patent Baristas) The post-Bilski landscape: Why some tried, but failed, to ban ‘business method’ patents (Prior… [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Heller and [New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.] [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Yet the flash points for student protest are just that. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:58 am by Nabiha Syed
In the blogosphere, Concurring Opinions hosted a “flash symposium” on the decision. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:35 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Amazon ‘Flash Sale’ Website Defeats Class Action Claim With Mandatory Arbitration Clause–Starke v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:08 am
– open letter to Lord Mandelson urging removal of clause 17 from Digital Economy Bill (1709 Copyright Blog)   United States US General US Department of Justice: Microsoft documentation ‘substantially complete’ (Ars Technica)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC finds specific case where claims need not be construed before determining validity: Perfect Web Techs, Inv v InfoUSA, Inc (GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas: Apple loses $21.7million in… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:52 am by Joy Waltemath
” But on a separate issue, he did not state a False Claims Act whistleblower retaliation claim against individual town officials because a 2009 amendment did not expand the FCA to provide individual liability (Howell v. [read post]