Search for: "Frank v. Frank" Results 721 - 740 of 6,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2011, 5:52 am by Walter Olson
[Ted Frank, Examiner] Tags: Vioxx Related posts Vioxx: Mark Lanier’s smears of the Ernst v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 111-203, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), is authority to issue regulations and take enforcement actions under the two major federal statutes that specify conditions under which customer financial information may be shared by financial institutions: Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA, P.L. 106-102) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 4:18 pm
Ted Frank brings his perspective on the 9th Circuit's affirmance of class certification in Dukes at Pointof Law.com. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor continues this week in the Supreme Court from Monday until Wednesday, and is being heard by a panel of seven (L Hope, L Walker, L Dyson, L Brown, L Clarke, L Sumption and L Reed). [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
            The Basics: Dodd-Frank v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 7:58 am by John Jascob
In a brief statement, the Commission announced that it would not seek further review of the July ruling in Koch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
  We’ve got one more question: will the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision in Lawson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:11 am
*A recent case from the IP Enterprise Court has the answer - Frank Industries PTY Ltd v Nike Retail BV [2018] EWHC 1893 (Ch)Frank Industries owns a UK and an EU mark for LNDR in relation to “clothing” including “sportswear”. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:43 pm by Kevin Funnell
The standard was meant to repeal the agency's sweeping 2004 preemption rules, returning it to the so-called 'Barnett standard' established by the 1996 Supreme Court case of Barnett V. [read post]