Search for: "Grant v. District of Columbia"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 6:29 pm
Tomorrow morning, a panel of three judges from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Chief Judge Sentelle along with Circuit Judges Ginsburg and Kavanaugh) will hear argument in the case of Salim Hamdan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:13 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that cleared the way for a pregnant teenager to obtain an abortion. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
The court granted that relief the same day. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
The District Court granted the College's request and denied that of the Union. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
The District Court granted the College's request and denied that of the Union. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
and drastically limited the Federal Judge's discretion to grant a the petition. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
Three new grants but no new opinions today from the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
Columbia Recovery Grp., No. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 6:36 pm
Columbia Sportswear v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Court’s decision allowing the continued federal funding of research involving human embryonic stem cells (“hESCs”). [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
In a comprehensive and careful 151-page opinion, a federal district court in Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Supreme Court precedent that supports the mandatory bar structure, which is used in 31 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Union v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
In this case, a District Court in District of Columbia, relying on Breakman v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Yet DRC thereafter filed enforcement proceedings in the District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
District of Columbia, #15-7062, 2016 U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 7:10 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, the plaintiffs allege that FERC does not require pipeline companies to demonstrate that their projects serve a “public use. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
British Columbia, by Robert T. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:30 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
