Search for: "Gray v. HAS" Results 721 - 740 of 1,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 11:50 am by Kent Scheidegger
  With every rule comes pesky little details about its boundaries in the gray zone and the means by which disputes on its application are resolved. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
This is the third in the four-part series from the brain injury case of Gregory Joseph Gagnon, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm by Adam Wagner
Sir Charles Gray made a similar ruling in Shergill’s case. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Copyright SpecialKat Hayleigh Bosher discusses in Jury awards Joyful Noise $2.8M in copyright infringement damages for Katy Perry's Dark Horse the reasons why the case of Marcus Gray v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The first, Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201) and the second, Bunt v Tilley ([2006] EWHC 407 (QB)) involved the liability of ISPs, the third Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. ([2009] EWHC 1765 (QB)), the liability of Google for results generated by its search engine. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court decided the seminal case of Alice Corp v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
In addition to shape, the words “another characteristic” has been added. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 4:26 pm by Berniard Law Firm
While the Court in Duncan did not explicitly deal with the timing of these tasks, a couple years later, the Court in Gray v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:21 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(The author has cited some of the gray literature of the scholarly communications movement in footnotes. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
  A line of cases has developed which tests the Eleventh Circuit’s broad reading of a “vessel. [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm by Adeline Chong
As a standalone limitation, it would be inconsistent with the conclusiveness principle in Godard v Gray (1870) LR 6 QB 139, as well as the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. [read post]