Search for: "HASTINGS v. US "
Results 721 - 740
of 792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2011, 2:38 pm
One that isn’t the same person who left you when he got sick of listening to you scream, “Who’s the freakin’ plaintiff in Pennoyer v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
This might explain some of what the Supreme Court said and did in the 1993 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
The SEC’s explanatory comments about the disclosure obligation endorsed restrictions regarding the use of the titles “advisor” and “adviser” and stated it would “presume” that BDs who are not also registered as RIAs violate the disclosure obligation when they refer to themselves or their RRs as “advisors” or “advisers. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
It is for us too. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
"[22] For years, fashion designers have attempted to combat design piracy through copyright law.[23] Although copyright law has successfully protected those designers whose works possess certain elements that can be identified separately from the utilitarian aspect of the clothing, copyright law generally fails to protect a design's overall concept.[24] Useful articles, like clothing, have not been traditionally copyrightable and the definition of design has not expansively… [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
Employer v employee Theft of IP and other sensitive information from companies is very common. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
In this sense, it is reasonable to say that ICANN governs the DNS and it directly affects the rights of the global Internet community. [33] V. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, University of Wisconsin-Madison (elizabeth@wisc.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu)South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu)South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University (tatiana.seijas@rutgers.edu)Latin America 3Michelle… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
” (Jones v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
Before us the parties deployed considerable arguments in support of their respective positions. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fraternal Order of Police v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:00 pm
A residuary clause constitutes an alternative devise with respect to a nonresiduary devise only if the will specifically provides that, upon lapse or failure, the nonresiduary devise, or nonresiduary devises in general, pass under the residuary clause. (2) “Class member” includes an individual who fails to survive the testator but who would have taken under a devise in the form of a class gift had he [or she] survived the testator. (3) “Descendant of a grandparent”, as… [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
