Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2008, 7:28 am
Along with last term's decision in United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:12 pm
Since our client resided in Chicago, IL, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:37 am
Since our client resided in Medina, OH, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 5:21 am
Since our client resided in Cleveland, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
Since our client resided in North Olmsted, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:19 pm
Holder, which was decided in 2009. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
Here is the BNA's summary:In a dispute involving the Iranian Ministry of Defense and holders of U.S. default judgments against Iran seeking to execute those judgments or attach against property found in the United States, is an attachment against foreign sovereign property permissible when that property is "at issue in claims against the United States before an international tribunal," and the property is not a "blocked asset,"… [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 1:58 pm
Dandamudi v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
Supreme Court's decision in Golan v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:24 am
Copyright Law when they were imported into the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm
The mother then filed a Hague petition in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:52 pm
See Robert Bosch LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:28 am
The United States Supreme Court unanimously held in Thompson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am
Oswin Ridderbusch and Alexa von UexküllOne of the features that render the European Union’s Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) unique in comparison to similar legal instruments in other jurisdictions, including the United States and Japan, is that there is no legal provision expressly calling for any specific relationship or agreement between the patent proprietor (and SPC applicant) on the one hand, and the holder of the marketing authorization relied… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
Holder v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:09 pm
On June 9, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 10:37 am
Land v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:44 pm
In Summa Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
