Search for: "In Re Adoption of G." Results 721 - 740 of 1,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2012, 8:10 am by Joe Consumer
We found this interesting, too: Thomas G. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:19 pm
However, thanks to a 1989 statute won by police unions at the Legislature, those same records are closed at 73 Texas cities that have adopted the state civil service code (Chapter 143.o89(g) of the Local Government Code).This has always been a personal beef of mine - most of these 73 cities opted into the civil service code via plebiscites in the '40s and '50s. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 4:58 am by Tammy Binford
  “There is no substitute for experience,” Susan G. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 4:27 am by Daniel Cappetta
Specifically, the bill includes the following changes to current law: Amends the bail statute to require that persons charged with a variety of enumerated domestic abuse offenses may not be admitted to bail for six hours after arrest and before a written determination has been made with respect to conditions of release to reasonably assure the safety of the alleged victim; Amends G. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:26 am by Broc Romanek
The irony is that they only adopted it after they were ordered to by a federal court. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 12:06 pm by G.A. Napier
Item (g) even expressly says that the failure in it must be for reasons “other than poverty alone. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am by Michael Ginsborg
She represented San Francisco in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008) and Strauss v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:46 pm by Mark Bennett
(g) A rule may not be promulgated unless it has been approved by the members of the state bar in the manner provided by this section. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
University Health Network, 2021 ONSC 7139 [3] It is perhaps necessary for me to underscore that this decision does not address the question of the merits or legality of the vaccine policy adopted by UHN. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 8:40 am by Simon Lester
Of course, it's easy to think of possible arguments that could be made, such as a defense under GATT Article XX(g). [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
1 May 2018, 5:30 am by Kevin
If I get an email with the subject line “Spa Bandit,” I’m gonna open it, because it almost certainly has to do with Marshall G. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 11:40 am
Patent and Trademark Office guidelines, and over a hundred years of case law [Ah, now we're talking!]. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:50 pm by Steve Kalar
This is an adoption of a Seventh Circuit rule and is new to the Ninth – worth exploring the outer parameters of this distinction if you’re trying to dodge plain error review.For Further Reading: One victory was not enough for Arizona last week – “the intrepid federal public defender” in Tuscon (a direct quote) chalked up another Rule 11 win as well. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am by Laura Sandwell
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
30 May 2009, 5:48 pm
[M]any civil rights groups say, Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation could provide an anchor against the current direction of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John G. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:10 am by Joe Consumer
We found this interesting, too: Thomas G. [read post]