Search for: "In Re Conduct of Jones"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2022, 2:27 pm
" See also Jones v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article for the Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, Jolynn Dellinger, a Senior Lecturing Fellow at Duke Law, and Stephanie K. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:45 am
” Jones v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:26 pm
Early this year, FINRA announced that it had begun conducting targeted examinations (sweeps) to assess how broker-dealers are managing cybersecurity threats.[4] FINRA’s sweeps letter requested information on over a dozen cybersecurity issues, and asked firms to complete an “impact analysis” regarding the likelihood and potential impact of various kinds of cyber attacks on the firm’s critical systems.[5] On March 26, 2014, the SEC convened a cybersecurity roundtable,… [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 7:53 pm
For example, they say, ‘we're going to try to get a monopoly by buying these logs at a lower price as, at as low a price as possible.'" The United States agreed that the possibility of "incompetent monopolists" shows the importance of having both an intent element and an independent conduct element. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:20 am
Jones was a case where the judges ruled that the police had no right to attach a tracking device under the defendant’s car without a warrant. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Following re-sentencing, Franklin again appealed, arguing that his re-sentencing violated his Sixth Amendment right to fact finding by a jury. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 1:37 pm
A misdemeanor conviction under the FDCA, unlike a felony conviction, does not require proof of fraudulent intent, or even of knowing or willful conduct. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am
In those cases, the Court held that plaintiffs cannot demonstrate a cognizable burden on their religious exercise by virtue of the government's own "internal" conduct, notwithstanding that the government action in question might in fact have a catastrophic impact on the plaintiffs' religious exercise (such as, in Lyng, by destroying the conditions at Native American sacred sites "without which the[ir] [religious] practices cannot be… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
Jones, 565 U. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
Jones, 565 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
Those who think that securing a registration without encountering an opposition means you’re safe should think again! [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:03 pm
He was re-elected for a third term in November 2022. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:28 am
He was re-elected for a third term in November 2022. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 4:47 pm
If you answered "yes," just remember: you're not paranoid if they're really out to get you. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:24 pm
While making people accountable for such reprehensible conduct is understandable (when they are accurately identified), online shaming can work differently to traditional shaming practices. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:28 am
He was re-elected for a third term in November 2022. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
No qualified immunity, the court said: In Jones v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:32 am
" In the words of Judge Edith Jones of the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 11:59 am
Nonetheless, it is also possible to see in this the way that systems will have to continuously (re)develop capacity as they invest more and more in quan [read post]
