Search for: "In Re Doe's Adoption" Results 721 - 740 of 13,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As the initial proposal was subject to substantial industry commentary, much of the preamble to the re-proposal is directed at addressing previous comments. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:13 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
But when the NLRB majority’s new decision is analyzed, does it really make a difference what test the NLRB uses to determine IC status? [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:09 pm by Orin Kerr
Does GPS Surveillance Justify A Departure from the Knotts/Karo Line? [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 6:40 am by Kate Fort
As also often happens, the parties start arguing about the very constitutionality of ICWA, making this case a “not as bad as it could have been” case–the court didn’t find ICWA is unconstitutional, nor does Adoptive Couple apply (as the de facto parents argued) to this fact pattern. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:35 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In In re PersonalWeb Techs. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
[A] does not respond to [R's] assertion that it copied the dissenting opinion verbatim; it appears [A] did. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
Re: #1 - Does the legal profession need to embrace new technology.? [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:16 pm by Ted Brooks
Now, if you’re still looking for some good excuses, you might want to check out ten of the best I could come up with: “Why You Should NOT Use Technology in Your Trial. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
  The Board affirmed the Examiner’s rejection, reasoning that the word “body” is a generic term without structural specificity and that the specification does not define the word and preclude the Examiner’s interpretation. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 8:07 pm by Dwight Sullivan
 How does it happen that these points are included in a congressional committee report when they’re irrelevant to the legislation at issue? [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Courthouse News on April 6 noted:Starting May 4, applicants for patents may pay to have their application expedited through the examination process, according to rules adopted by the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:57 pm
The proposal would amend the arbitration procedures adopting rules for expunction of consumer complaints for parties that are not named. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:46 am by Andrew Frisch
After a review of the applicable authority, this Court adopts the reasoning of the Second Circuit and holds that Plaintiffs are not outside salesmen or administrative employees under FLSA. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm by Myers Freelance
Recently, we’re seeing watershed moments in the centuries-long adoption of the use of the pronoun “they” in the singular form. [read post]