Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc." Results 721 - 740 of 997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm by Steven Boutwell
Courts have generally whittled the “utility requirement” into a de minimus (minimal) threshold. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
We (well, Bexis) submitted an amicus brief in Hamilton in the Texas Supreme Court earlier this week. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Abortion, conscientious objection and the UK Supreme Court: Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am by Robichaud
Four seminal cases from the Supreme Court of Canada have led to a reset – or at least a re-affirmation – of the fundamental tenets underlying the Court’s approach to pre-trial detention. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am by Robichaud
Four seminal cases from the Supreme Court of Canada have led to a reset – or at least a re-affirmation – of the fundamental tenets underlying the Court’s approach to pre-trial detention. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Finally, I of course acknowledge that the Supreme Court has indeed upheld some restrictions on lawyers that aren't applicable to ordinary citizens, on the rationale that lawyers are officers of the court. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am by Jenny Gesley
However, there were no restrictions on non-cash transactions such as checks, credit/debit cards, etc. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm by Schachtman
The trial court, in reviewing Pfizer’s challenge, saw that Murphy’s opinion essentially was determined by (1), (2), and (3), above. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:11 am
In January 2003, Justice Antonin Scalia went on a duck-hunting trip to Louisiana with Vice President Dick Cheney, a litigant in a case before the US Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by JB
  Among other things, the Supreme Court has held that the government’s true end is irrelevant in rational basis cases, and the government need not support any of its factual assertions with evidence. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am by Bexis
”  The Supreme Court has observed that Section 337(a) “leaves no doubt that it is the Federal Government rather than private litigants who are authorized to file suit for noncompliance with the medical device provisions. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
You know the type of stuffed shirt we're talking about. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 3:06 am by Mandelman
~~~ And the second is… September 24 & 25, 2011 New York City New York Law School Speakers at the New York City seminar include: Judge Arthur Schack – New York Supreme Court Justice who has gained notoriety for taking the unusual stance “If you are going to take away someone? [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
DeMarco, etc., respondent.WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS in the nature of an application to release Susai Francis from the custody of the Sheriff of Suffolk County.New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY (Jordan Wells, Paige Austin, Mariana Kovel, Christopher Dunn, and Scout Katovich of counsel), and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY (Omar C. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:46 pm by Robert Chesney
 I confess I like this idea very much, particularly if it is done in a manner that empowers the advocate to lodge appeals with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review and, when necessary, to seek certiorari at the Supreme Court. [read post]