Search for: "In re Application of Johns" Results 721 - 740 of 6,576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
’” In re Fat Boys Water Sports LLC, 118 U.S.P.Q.2d 1511, 1515-16 (T.T.A.B. 2016) (quoting In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 71 U.S.P.Q.2d 1370, 1372 (Fed. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:29 am
As to the unitary nature of INFORMATION BUILDERS, applicant owns three related, block-letter registrations for that phrase with only INFORMATION disclaimed.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
Other commentators have provided an excellent summary of the Federal Circuit’s opinion, see, e.g., Rebecca Tushnet, Jennifer Rothman, and John Welch, so this blog post will focus on the implications of the decision rather than provide a detailed summary of it. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:45 am
"And so, the Board affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal.TTABlog comment: I guess you can say the Applicant here was left in Dire Straits.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:44 am
In re Brough, Serial No. 78680981 (January 30, 2008) [not precedential]Applicant Brough did not dispute the meaning of "mink" as an animal fur, nor that mink is used in various clothing items. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’” Johns Hopkins Univ. v. [read post]