Search for: "In re April B." Results 721 - 740 of 3,285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Fed has already cut interest rates essentially to zero, and (as it did during the Great Recession a decade ago) it is continuing to try to come up with extraordinary measures to meet these extraordinary times.Darien Shanske, a professor specializing in tax law at UC Davis, laid out a plan in an April 20 essay on Medium: “The Fed Can and Should Help States and Localities Right Now. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
On April 13, 2020 the SEC suspended trading in the company’s securities. [read post]
14 May 2020, 12:09 pm by Phil Dixon
Where grounds for recusal of trial judge would arise only during sentencing (if at all), defendant was not entitled to writ of mandamus ordering recusal from trial In Re: John Moore, 955 F.3d 384 (April 9, 2020). [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:39 am
In re Lord Lion Winery LLC, Serial No. 87808799 (April 11, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:15 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
(I hope I’m not awake for it.) pic.twitter.com/uTW8cqcn1X – Andy Hunter (@AndyHunter777) April 27, 2020 Bookshop, a Certified B corporation, was launched in January with a mission to help indie bookstores, which for years fought to compete with chains like Barnes & Noble and then the online retail giant Amazon. [read post]
On April 3, 2019, a class action lawsuit was filed against J-B Weld Company, LLC (“J-B Weld”), a leading manufacturer of cold weld products that makes a wide range of sealants, adhesives, and other products, alleging that J-B Weld’s “Made in USA” representations were false and misleading. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am by Schachtman
Capra, Reporter’s Memorandum re Forensic Evidence, Daubert and Rule 702 at 52 (April 1, 2018) (“[T]he fact remains that some courts are ignoring the requirements of Rule 702(b) and (d). [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:33 am by InhouseBlog
Are you a re-creator looking for a similar position and culture? [read post]