Search for: "In re Cal. E." Results 721 - 740 of 1,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2012, 11:04 am by Tom Goldstein
Cal.) and Alison Nathan (39, S.D.N.Y.). [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 5:32 pm
Turney (1978) 22 Cal.3d 718: “Of the two measures the ‘out-of-pocket’ rule has been termed more consistent with the logic and purpose of the tort form of action (i. e., compensation for loss sustained rather than satisfaction of contractual expectations) while the ‘benefit-of-the-bargain’ rule has been observed to be a more effective deterrent (in that it contemplates an award even when the property received has a value equal to… [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 7:07 am
Turney (1978) 22 Cal.3d 718: “Of the two measures the ‘out-of-pocket’ rule has been termed more consistent with the logic and purpose of the tort form of action (i. e., compensation for loss sustained rather than satisfaction of contractual expectations) while the ‘benefit-of-the-bargain’ rule has been observed to be a more effective deterrent (in that it contemplates an award even when the property received has a value equal to… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
Cal., Case No. 4:2011cv-04766 (Sept. 26, 2011), and In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
We don't read every warning that we encounter - and we're defense lawyers. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
  Because they’re banks, that’s why… and these days, banks and fraud are like bees and honey, don’t you know. [read post]