Search for: "Laurence Tribe"
Results 721 - 740
of 790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
One of the magazines to which I subscribe sends out weekly emails summarizing the blur of recent events. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The theoretical justifications of the nondelegation doctrine stem from, as Professor Laurence Tribe has observed, “implicit constitutional requirements of consensual government under law. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
" Tribe was right. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
From a misreading of the Twelfth Amendment.In late September 2020, I co-authored a Verdict column with Professors Michael Dorf and Laurence Tribe, in which we showed that the clear text of the Twelfth Amendment did not support the Trumpists’ scheme. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The constitutional crisis caused by the Republicans’ attempts at extortion via the debt ceiling has now increased from a simmer to a boil. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:28 am
Nonetheless, Laurence Tribe is almost certainly correct in reading Lawrence as protecting a fundamental right under a slightly different name. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
In today’s column, I criticize its reliance on the views of liberal scholars.In a single paragraph, Justice Alito cites John Hart Ely, Archibald Cox, Laurence Tribe, Mark Tushnet, Philip Bobbitt, and Akhil Amar for the proposition that the reasoning of Roe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
This repository contains a collection of information for researchers, journalists, educators, scholars, and the public at large. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:05 am
Professor Laurence Tribe called Hill “slam-dunk simple and slam-dunk wrong. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:43 am
Tribe, Anatomy of a Fraud: Kenneth Chesebro’s Misrepresentation of My Scholarship in His Efforts to Overturn the 2020 Presidential Election, Just Security (Aug 8, 2023) Albert W. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
" Laurence H. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Interested readers would do well to consult Chapter 3 of Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe’s Abortion: The Clash of Absolutesor SUNY-Buffalo Vice Provost Lucinda Finley’s Chapter 10 of my book, Constitutional Law Stories. [read post]
16 May 2022, 6:56 am
Democrats agreed (as did a later federal judge) that Clinton knowingly committed perjury under oath, but Democratic witnesses like Professor Laurence Tribe insisted that impeachment was simply not that broad. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:23 am
This post examines a Wisconsin DUI (or OWI) case that raised a couple of interesting issues concerning Electronic Monitoring Devices (EMDs). [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 11:08 am
Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe, for example, joined me in concluding that the proposed federal victims' rights amendment would "add[] victims' rights that can coexist side by side with defendants.'" Most victims' rights initiative are largely cost-free, as they simply involve allow victims to participate in existing processes. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
As Dershowitz’s Harvard colleague Professor Laurence Tribe explains, however, the teenage right to abortion does not really bear on the issue, because not having an abortion means that a girl has to carry a pregnancy to term and give birth, an even more invasive and risky imposition on her body than an abortion. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
Justice Alito introduced his high-minded topic, the role of the federal courts in constitutional interpretation, but couldn't resist snarky references to the titles of two recent books about the Constitution by left-of-center law professors: Laurence Tribe's The Invisible Constitution and Cass Sunstein's A Constitution of Many Minds. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 6:30 am
Harvard made a similar announcement some years ago--with Laurence Tribe designated as the prospective E.I.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
” This seems to be the attitude, for example, both of Harvard Professor Laurence Tribe (from somewhat on the left) and former Solicitor General and current Harvard Professor Charles Fried (from somewhat on the right), both of whom have made clear their belief that since health care is such a huge part of the economy (reportedly about one-seventh of it) that surely Congress must be able to regulate it under its Commerce Clause powers, and, surely, requiring… [read post]
