Search for: "Law v. USA"
Results 721 - 740
of 6,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
Case date: 14 September 2021 Case number: No. 20-3369 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 4:05 am
The case was consolidated for oral argument with We the Patriots USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:15 am
Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, No. 21-118 (mandamus review of IPR petition denial); Infineum USA L.P. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:13 am
Caudel v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 6:17 am
” HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 4:25 pm
Alex Moss: Amicus Brief of Public Interest Patent Law Institute in Silbersher v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 2:55 pm
Pa.), the background: In this case, Alchem USA Inc. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:06 am
In the case of Orum v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
On the other hand, in 1997, long before Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Boyd Professor of Law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas Boyd School of Law. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
In October 2016, the ACLU filed a motion seeking access to the court’s opinions and orders from Sept. 11, 2001 through the passage of the USA Freedom Act in 2015 (in which Congress required some declassification of opinions but which did not apply to prior opinions). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
See Aromont USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 4:52 pm
” John Fritze of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court signals willingness to allow Kentucky attorney general to defend state’s abortion law. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am
In the past, antitrust law was used to promote competition and to protect citizens from concentrated economic power. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Ga.)); Bring a complaint in California federal court along with Attorneys General from six states (claims made by five states based on pendent jurisdiction dismissed in FTC v. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am
" (Cox, 30-31) (quoting Advanta USA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:11 am
Evidence of third-party use of similar marks was “thin” (FocusVision Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:11 am
Evidence of third-party use of similar marks was “thin” (FocusVision Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:56 am
YouTube’s TOS says: All claims arising out of or relating to these terms or the Service will be governed by California law, except California’s conflict of laws rules, and will be litigated exclusively in the federal or state courts of Santa Clara County, California, USA. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:45 pm
USA, Inc., 209 Cal. [read post]
