Search for: "Little v. USA"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
Iran Following protests on 15 November 2019 the Iran government imposed an internet shutdown which has been the subject of much commentary- the Telegraph, USA Today, and PBS Newshour comment. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm
I’ve said very little about the Google Book Settlement (“GBS”) to date because it is so complex and because is raises so many unanswerable questions. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
The Little Tikes Company filed 04/16/07 1:07-cv-02131 Health Hero Network, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:06 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
The prior published opinion in this case, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:30 am
V. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
There seems little point in trying to revert to the previous term of lifetime plus fifty years, which though arguably a desirable step in the right direction for copyright generally, would cause immense difficulties in trading with partners like the USA, who are hell-bent on forcing other nations to come up to the plus 70 years standard (vide TPP and the changes to Canadian copyright law). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm
I increasingly have little patience for those who offer any kind of unreflective praise of the Constitution. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:27 pm
Allergan USA, Inc., 2009 WL 3294873 (D. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 12:47 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 2010 WL 8357563, slip op. at 1-2 (Tex. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am
” Briefly: Following Lucia v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:12 am
Webster v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:26 pm
Litigation between the Episcopal Church (USA) and its parishes has been ongoing for more than fifteen years. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:26 pm
Hydro-Blok USA LLC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
On the other hand, in 1997, long before Shelby County v. [read post]
UK court discusses copyright protection of fictional characters and defences for parody and pastiche
9 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
In a judgment handed down yesterday - Shazam v Only Fools The Dining Experience and Others [2022] EWHC 1379 (IPEC) - the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) answered 'yes' and applied guidance derived from EU law, including the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Cofemel (Katposts here).Let's see what happened.BackgroundOnly Fools and Horses (OFAH) is a successful BBC TV series that ran between 1981 and 1991, with also some Christmas… [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Not only that, but it refused to acknowledge the ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court in 2009 in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 11:44 pm
Justice Roberts, with whom I rarely find myself in agreement (and would he stop with that smirky smile, already), got this much exactly right in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
This is a slanderous and callous characterization of the three in 10 American women who have decided to terminate a pregnancy and shows that Paul has little concern for one of the most fundamental civil liberty protections for women, as if mere convenience is all that is at stake for these women and their families. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:03 am
Bezdek v. [read post]