Search for: "Lynch v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Lynch 15-583Issue: Whether the district court can refuse to apply the Newman v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:36 am
Reimbursing the employer for certain Section 207-c benefits it paid to individual returned to part-time employment Lynch v South Nyack/Grandview Police Department., 276 A.D.2d 63 The Lynch decision has two important elements, one of significance to employers; the other of significance to employees. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1339 (11th Cir. 2002), abrogated on other grounds by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:24 am
Ruttiger, which held there was no common-law bad-faith action in the Lone Star State for workers' compensation claims handling.Likewise, two months after Ruttiger came out, though, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the state's injured workers do not have a common-law right of action for pain and suffering caused by an insurer's administration of a workers' compensation claim in Stancil v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:25 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:48 am
" In Lynch v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Merril Lynch, Pierce Fenner andamp; Smith, Inc., 532 F. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:20 pm
Lynch, 934 F.2d 1226, 1236-37 (11th Cir. 1991); United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Lynch, 575 U.S. _____ (2015). [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:01 am
The defendants in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
(quoting Rider v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:44 am
The plaintiffs sue for false arrest.The case is Garcia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
That is what the Court of Appeals is telling us in a ruling that vacates a conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm.The case is United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:42 am
" Volvo Trademark Holding AB v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:20 am
For the brief: https://www.eff.org/document/rios-v-united-states-eff-brief Tags: Locational PrivacyContact: AndrewCrockerStaff Attorneyandrew@eff.org [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:32 am
The Court of Appeals gives it back.The case is Newton v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:54 pm
The case, entitled Jones v. [read post]
